Zibtek

One of the seasoned experts in the development world indicated that .NET constrains the choices of users because it turns its focus inward toward the perceived security of the framework. According to some experts, the framework does not help users to experience the possibilities in the world. The truth is that there is a stigma surrounding .NET. The distaste could be fueled by a general dislike of Microsoft by users. Some people felt that the technology has become less relevant as more advanced open source technologies arise. Microsoft became aware of the growing concerns and the insurgence of new alternatives. The company now offers .NET as an open-source framework. Using .NET narrows the usability of the applications because they can only be installed in Windows. Users have to incur additional costs, such as upgrade charges, royalties for using Windows, and SQL server charges. It would be a surprise that .NET is still a relevant language given the fact that technology is evolving qui...

There is a stigma that surrounds .net amongst many. The source of this stigma could be the distaste many have towards Microsoft. The feeling amongst many is that this technology is irrelevant because more alternative open-source platforms have come up. Microsoft is aware of the situation and now offers the .net server stack services in open source. Some would ask what .net is suitable for. If we look at .net from the perspective of a business, many would argue that such apps are only installed by Windows users. The platform also comes with added costs, such as royalties, suing the SQL server, and upgrades. Our world is experiencing a growth in technology. It is hard to think that a platform such as .net would be relevant amidst the technological advancements. Be that as it may, .net is still alive and well in Silicon Valley. Microsoft has made the .net server stack open source. The decision includes the .net compiler, asp.net, .net runtime, libraries, and framework. As such, developers...

One of the masters of software development stated that the .net framework limits developers on their ability to choose. The argument is that .NET focuses more on perceived safety at the expense of helping users to explore the numerous possibilities the world has to offer. The truth is that there is a blemish surrounding .NET. The source of this distaste for .NET may be the fact that some developers dislike Microsoft by default. The feeling among many is that as alternative open-source platforms become available, the technology has become irrelevant. Microsoft is aware of this and has started to offer an open-source full-stack server. From the perspective of the entire business and not developers, the Windows framework can narrow the app installation market because the app gets installed by those who use windows predominantly. Moreover, there are additional costs for using the SQL server, upgrades, and royalties paid to Microsoft. In a world where technology is changing and evolving, it...